<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Innocent sold out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crmatters.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/has-innocent-sold-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crmatters.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/has-innocent-sold-out/</link>
	<description>musings on strategy, brand and engagement with a CR bent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:40:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kamilla Kruse</title>
		<link>http://crmatters.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/has-innocent-sold-out/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamilla Kruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 06:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crmatters.wordpress.com/?p=450#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Actually I think that the philantropic dimension of Innocent&#039;s CR fades with coke&#039;s acquisition. Yes, Innocent might still produce its products in the same way, but coke bought the company because the concept was profitable - and I would then question if the new administration was as trustworthy as the old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think that the philantropic dimension of Innocent&#8217;s CR fades with coke&#8217;s acquisition. Yes, Innocent might still produce its products in the same way, but coke bought the company because the concept was profitable &#8211; and I would then question if the new administration was as trustworthy as the old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
